<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pen Review: Faber-Castell E-Motion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.recordingthoughts.com/index.php/archives/2005/10/26/pen-review-faber-castell-e-motion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.recordingthoughts.com/index.php/archives/2005/10/26/pen-review-faber-castell-e-motion/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=pen-review-faber-castell-e-motion</link>
	<description>Everything you need to record your thoughts: Journals, Notepads, Notebooks, Pens, Pencils, Paper, PDAs, Digital Voice Recorders, Voice Recognition, Voice to Print, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:06:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olie</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingthoughts.com/index.php/archives/2005/10/26/pen-review-faber-castell-e-motion/comment-page-1/#comment-30574</link>
		<dc:creator>Olie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingthoughts.com/2005/10/26/pen-review-faber-castell-e-motion/#comment-30574</guid>
		<description>Great review and so nice to see reader follow ups. Due to the severe taper mentioned by The Rover as well as the dreaded refill click you mention (thanks for being so thorough,) I&#039;m planning on steering clear of this choice. Great info. Thank you.
Olie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review and so nice to see reader follow ups. Due to the severe taper mentioned by The Rover as well as the dreaded refill click you mention (thanks for being so thorough,) I&#8217;m planning on steering clear of this choice. Great info. Thank you.<br />
Olie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apollo</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingthoughts.com/index.php/archives/2005/10/26/pen-review-faber-castell-e-motion/comment-page-1/#comment-5895</link>
		<dc:creator>Apollo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingthoughts.com/2005/10/26/pen-review-faber-castell-e-motion/#comment-5895</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got a Faber Castell E-Motion ballpoint in black resin with a crocodile motif and polished chrome accents. It&#039;s a bit nicer than the standard pearwood version (more expensive too), but otherwise it&#039;s the same pen. I love the pen&#039;s feel, design and clip. Best of all, it uses Parker-type refills which are very easy to find. About the only negative thing I could say about the E-Motion is that some may find the grip on the slippery side, but I&#039;ve got no complaints.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got a Faber Castell E-Motion ballpoint in black resin with a crocodile motif and polished chrome accents. It&#8217;s a bit nicer than the standard pearwood version (more expensive too), but otherwise it&#8217;s the same pen. I love the pen&#8217;s feel, design and clip. Best of all, it uses Parker-type refills which are very easy to find. About the only negative thing I could say about the E-Motion is that some may find the grip on the slippery side, but I&#8217;ve got no complaints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rover</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingthoughts.com/index.php/archives/2005/10/26/pen-review-faber-castell-e-motion/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingthoughts.com/2005/10/26/pen-review-faber-castell-e-motion/#comment-111</guid>
		<description>I have mixed feelings about this pen.  I have one of the pearwood versions with stainless top and bottom.  If you grip the pen on the metal section at the bottom it is difficult/uncomfortable to hold.  The taper is so severe at this point that the advantage of having the fat pen is lost.  For this reason I&#039;ve been thinking about getting one of the Fat Boy pens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have mixed feelings about this pen.  I have one of the pearwood versions with stainless top and bottom.  If you grip the pen on the metal section at the bottom it is difficult/uncomfortable to hold.  The taper is so severe at this point that the advantage of having the fat pen is lost.  For this reason I&#8217;ve been thinking about getting one of the Fat Boy pens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Meisenzahl</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingthoughts.com/index.php/archives/2005/10/26/pen-review-faber-castell-e-motion/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meisenzahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 06:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingthoughts.com/2005/10/26/pen-review-faber-castell-e-motion/#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Nice pen. I&#039;ve got the mech pencil version, 1.4mm lead!  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice pen. I&#8217;ve got the mech pencil version, 1.4mm lead!  <img src='http://www.recordingthoughts.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

